Answer:
$7,604,500
Explanation:
Total cost of goods sold:
= Cost of goods sold of Patti Company + Cost of goods sold of Shannon Inc.
= $7,500,000 + $160,000
= $7,660,000
Consolidated cost of goods sold:
= Total cost of goods sold - Intra-Entity sales added in cost of goods sold of Shannon Inc. + Unrealized profit on ending inventory eliminated by adjusting cost of goods sold
= $7,660,000 - $60,000 + ($60,000 × 0.25) × 30%
= $7,660,000 - $60,000 + $4,500
= $7,604,500
C. Your charging less for the same thing as your component they’re spending less money but your making more because more people will come to your location
Answer:
The amount of dividends distributed to preferred stockholders in 2017 is $10000.
Explanation:
The preferred stock is non cumulative which means that if the company is unable to pay dividends on preferred stock in a certain year, the dividend for that year will not be accumulated and will not be paid in the next year.
Thus, the company only paid a dividend of $2700 in 2016 and the remaining dividends will not be payable by the company in year 2017.
The dividend on each share of preferred stock per year is = 10 * 0.05 = $0.5 per share
The number of shares of preferred stock are 20000.
The total dividends that will be paid to preferred stock holders in 2017 is = 0.5 * 20000 = $10000
Thus, out of the $27000 dividends of 2017, $10000 was distributed to preferred stockholders.
<span>According to revised weight-loss prediction equations, a deficit of 10 kilocalories per day leads to an average weight loss of one pound over a 3-year period. Also if you noticed that during your losing of weight program you slowed down, it means that you have to increase your physical activity to compensate for it.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
