There were many hostile indians in the area
Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
Answer:
Beginning in 1907, Mohandas Gandhi and his followers staged non-violent protests and refused to follow an unjust law in South Africa. One result of Ghandi's methods was that:
D. <u>The South African government repealed a law discriminating against Indians</u>.
Explanation:
Mahatma Gandhi was able to witness firsthand, during his stay in South Africa, the discrimination suffered by the Indians by white people, who even once tried to lynch him, later, in 1906, <em>the South African government of Transvaal, in a fight against immigration of Asian origin, he issued a law that forced all Indians residing in his country to register through a census</em>, which, given the different forms of discrimination, <u>could mean a way to locate and attack them more easily</u>, Therefore Gandhi initiated a peaceful protest the following year that, although it caused from arrests to executions for the Indian people, <u>influenced the government to reverse the law</u>.
The 2nd Debater
Because he has evidence on why they shouldn’t have rights.
