The appropriate response is Affective. This part manages sentiments or feelings that are conveyed to the surface about something, for example, dread or despise. Utilizing our above illustration, somebody may have the disposition that they despise young people since they are languid or that they cherish all infants since they are adorable.
This is an example of a non-disparagement agreement.
<h3><u>What is a non-disparagement agreement?</u></h3>
A part of an agreement, such as an employment contract, separation agreement, or marital settlement agreement, stipulates that the involved parties are prohibited from making any negative statements, remarks, or representations about each other. Such clauses are in prevalent use to prevent (ex) employees from adversely affecting the business of employers with disparaging public statements either during or after the employment period has ended.
<h3><u>What Takes Place If a Non-Disparagement Clause Is Broken?</u></h3>
A non-disparagement agreement is still a contract with potential legal repercussions if you don't uphold your half of the bargain, just like any other legal instrument. A breach of a non-disparagement agreement typically has financial repercussions. You might be required to repay all or a portion of your severance pay if non-disparagement was a requirement for you to receive it, depending on the terms of the agreement.
Learn more about the non-disparagement agreement with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14592097?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
a trading account deals with the u.s. government
Answer:
Explanation: A. Shadow price has not changed because Shadow price show value of a commodity without considering final cost.
B. Change in value 180 - 150/180 X 100 = 16.7
C. The optimal solution didn't change because the product price went from it highest profit 180 to it's least cost 150