Everyone gets a say, everyone has a voice even if u can’t speak, also it’s a fair choice on elections
Answer:
may justify or excuse an accused defendant's actions, and which will tend to show the defendant is not guilty or has no criminal intent.
Explanation:
Answer:
probative value
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides legal protection against search and seizure without good reason and without a search and seizure warrant. As we can see from the question above, Mick Stoner was charged with marijuana, which was taken from a legal dispensary in Denver, seized without a search warrant, so Mick Stoner's defense attorney disputes the evidential value of the evidence, claiming that the truck's initial search violated the Fourth Amendment.
To dispute the probative value of the evidence means that the evidence gathered, in this case, is not guaranteed, by itself, to support a condemnatory sentence, thus requiring the repetition in court of some of the evidence produced.
Answer:
200 million dollars.
Explanation:
The Sherman Law is an anti-trust law implemented in the year 1980 to outlaw market monopolization and anticompetitive agreements among businesses and corporations. The Sherman Antitrust Act states that corporates that violate the law would be subjected to a fine of about 100 million dollars per violations.
Therefore, if LMNOP Corp. has been convicted of two distinct and separate violations under the the Sherman Act, LMNOP may be fined as much as 200 million dollars for these two violations.
Answer:
majority of felony charges are mainly handeled on the proofs and witnesses.
