Answer:
d) remembering to buy bread at the store.
Explanation:
In psychology, the term prospective memory refers to a form of memory that involves remembering to perform a planned action at some future point in time.
This type of memory is common in everyday situations and it allows us<u> to not forget to do some particular task. </u>
From the options given, the one option that specifically refers to <u>NOT FORGET TO DO SOME PARTICULAR TASK is d) remembering to buy bread at the store.</u>
Thus, this would be an example of prospective memory.
According to Sered and Fernandopulle, in their article "sick out of luck," the situation that people like Fran and Lenny find themselves in is <u>private insurance.</u>
<u></u>
Any health insurance plan presented by means of a personal preferred coverage organization rather than the authorities is known as a personal health plan. these plans provide access to better sum insured and superior medical care, usually at a better top rate.
Private health insurance is medical coverage bought immediately by a character. This coverage can be for the person alone or for the individual and his or her own family and dependents.
Private health insurance is commonly funded via blessings plans provided by employers. Examples consist of: Blue pass and Blue protect medical health insurance corporations.
<u></u>
Learn more about health insurance here: brainly.com/question/1941778
#SPJ4
Answer:
Its easy first you have to CHANGE TO ENGLISH LIKE WHATTT
Answer:
think I might know but I need the options, it might be Institutional Discrimination
Explanation:
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 requires that habeas cases be brought within <u>one</u> year(s) after a defendant exhausts his or her regular appeals.
The 1996 Counterterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act creates a new court whose sole task is to hear cases in which the government is attempting to deport foreigners accused of being involved in terrorist activities based on sensitive information.
Establish a one-year post-judgment period for state prisoners filing federal Habeas corpus appeals. Six months for a state prisoner sentenced to death who was offered a lawyer for a state-level Habeas appeal.
AEDPA also unnecessarily and arguably unconstitutionally restricted prisoners' access to Habeas corpus relief. When this appeared in the Supreme Court of Felker v. Jun.
Learn more about Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act here: brainly.com/question/4395621
#SPJ4
