All categories

3 years ago

Why would Apple & Sony partnership be successful

Business

1 answer:

zhenek [66]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Three reasons would make Apple & Sony partnership successful.

The first one would be research and development share to create better products.

The second would be to increase the software market for their platforms.

Third the copyright payments for both companies on digital media would be reduced at least by 50%.

Explanation:

To understand this answer we need to analyze the context. First of all, both companies are always researching technology to overcome the other. Therefore, if they cooperate they could share their development and create better products with less investment. Second, both companies protect their software so they can't import formats from one company to the other, therefore their market could increase. Third, they both pay copyright for their digital libraries, however, if they cooperate they could cut the cost of it by half of it and increase their profit.

You might be interested in

An ever-expanding variety of goods and services are in demand by consumers all around the world. given the importance of world t

Vlada [557]

An ever-expanding variety of goods and services are in demand by consumers all around the world. given the importance of world trade, countries are inclined to attempt to control the trade for their own benefit.

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade is now administered by the World Trade Organization. The International Court of Justice is composed exclusively of U.S. judges. The Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization (DSB) is a bona fide court.

International trade allows countries to expand their markets and gain access to goods and services that were not available domestically. World trade has made the market more competitive. This ultimately leads to more competitive pricing and consumers get cheaper products.

Learn more about world trade at

brainly.com/question/13422134

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

Jackson Company produces plastic that is used for injection-molding applications such as gears for small motors. In 2016, the fi

valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

a.Income Statement using variable costing

2016 2017

Sales $7,872,000 $9,840,000

Less Cost of Sales ($1,338,240) ($1,672,800)

Opening Stock $0 $334,560

Add Cost of Goods Manufactured $1,672,800 $1,338,240

Less Closing Stock ($334,560) $0

Contribution $6,533,760 $8,167,200

Less Expenses :

Fixed manufacturing costs ($3,075,000) ($3,075,000)

Selling Expenses : Variable ($862,920) ($1,082,400)

Selling Expenses : Fixed ($500,000) ($500,000)

Net Income / (loss) $2,095,840 $3,509,800

b.Income Statement using absorption costing

2016 2017

Sales $7,872,000 $9,840,000

Less Cost of Sales ($3,798,240) ($5,362,800)

Opening Stock $0 $949,560

Add Cost of Goods Manufactured $4,747,800 $4,413,240

Less Closing Stock ($949,560) $0

Gross Profit $4,073,760 $4,477,200

Less Expenses :

Selling Expenses : Variable ($862,920) ($1,082,400)

Selling Expenses : Fixed ($500,000) ($500,000)

Net Income / (loss) $2,710,840 $2,894,800

c. Reconciliation of Absorption costing Net Income to variable costing profit

2016 2017

Absorption Costing Net Income $2,710,840 $2,894,800

Fixed Manufacturing Cost in Opening Stock $0 $615,000

Fixed Manufacturing Cost in Closing Stock ($615,000) $0

Variable Costing Net Income $2,095,840 $3,509,800

Explanation:

Part a.

Under Variable Costing, Only Variable Manufacturing Costs are treated as Product costs. Fixed Manufacturing costs and All Non-Manufacturing Costs are treated as period costs.

Part b

Under Absorption Costing, Both Variable Manufacturing Costs and Fixed Manufacturing costs are treated as Product costs. All Non-Manufacturing Costs are treated as period costs.

Part c.

The difference between the Net Income under Absorption Costing and Variable Costing is due to Fixed Manufacturing Costs that are deferred in Inventory. This needs to be reconciled accordingly.

5 0

3 years ago

Parido Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Casting and Assembly. The company used the following data at the beginning

Ivan

Answer:

Allocated MOH= $26,372

Explanation:

First, we need to calculate the predetermined overhead rate:

Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base

Total fixed overhead= 48,200

Total variable overhead= (1.9*8,000) + (3*2,000)= $21,200

Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= (48,200 + 21,200) / 10,000

Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $6.94 per machine hour

Now, we can allocate overhead to Job H:

Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base

Allocated MOH= 6.94*(2,600 + 1,200)

Allocated MOH= $26,372

8 0

3 years ago

Juanita receives her paycheck and knows that her gross pay and federal tax are correct. Using the fact that Social Security tax

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

a. The net pay is correct.

Explanation:

Suppose the missing part of the question which is the gross pay and the federal tax is 1020.00 and 107.00 respectively.

Then, Social Security tax 6.2% of the gross pay = $\dfrac{6.2}{100}\times 1020$

Social Security tax 6.2% of the gross pay = 0.062 × 1020

Social Security tax 6.2% of the gross pay = $63.24

the Medicare tax is 1.45% of gross pay = $\dfrac{1.45}{100} \times 1020$

the Medicare tax is 1.45% of gross pay = 0.0145 × 1020

the Medicare tax is 1.45% of gross pay = $14.79

the state tax is 19% of federal tax = $\dfrac{19}{100} \times 107$

the state tax is 19% of federal tax = 0.19 × 107

the state tax is 19% of federal tax = $20.33

Hence, to determine if Juanita's net pay is correct, we have the summation of all our estimated figures minus the gross pay.

i.e

Juanita's net pay = $1020 - $(107 + 63.24 + 14.79 + 20.33)

Juanita's net pay = $1020 - 205.36

Juanita's net pay = $814.64

3 0

2 years ago

The December 31, 2021, inventory of Tog Company, based on a physical count, was determined to be $467,000. Included in that coun

8090 [49]

Answer:

Tog Company

a. The correct December 31, 2021 balance of Inventory is

= $592,500.

b. The error increased the cost of goods sold, thereby reducing the net income and the retained earnings.

c. Journal Entries to correct errors:

Debit 2021 Inventory $67,000

Credit 2022 Inventory $67,000

To correct the error.

December 31, 2021

Debit Purchase $97,000

Credit Accounts Payable $97,000

To record the purchase of merchandise, shipped FOB shipping point on December 28, 2021.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Physical count Inventory = $467,000

FOB shipping point 2021 = 28,500

December 28 FOB shipping point = 97,000

December 31, 2021 balance = $592,500

The error would increase the cost of goods sold, thereby reducing the net income and the retained earnings.

Journal Entries to correct errors:

December 31, 2021

a. 2021 Inventory $67,000 2022 Inventory $67,000. The records should be for 2021 and not 2022.

b. This only affects the physical count and not the records.

c. Purchase $97,000 Accounts Payable $97,000. Both the physical count and the records were omitted.

4 0

3 years ago