I think for this item, it will be acceptable if we suggest that the branch manager's salary would be increased. It is through him/her and the dedication of the team members that the sales are very high. If the salary is not increased then, the manager and the team should be compensated for the job well done.
Answer:
a. Leslie, who is independent and self-confident. She doesn’t need people to tell her what to do.
b. Malcolm, who loves to play. His last boss says that Malcolm was the "chief kid" in his last office.
c. Frankie, who has been in the toy business for 10 years and who knows what he’s doing, but who always likes testing a new idea.
Explanation:
In this scenario the CEO of a start-up toy manufacturer wants to create at least 10 wildly different toys in the next three years.
He will primarily need people that are creative and are inclined to work with new ideas.
The wrong choice will be someone who follows the rules and is stable. Such a staff will not contribute new ideas that will move the company to make profits.
Leslie is confident and does not need to be told what to do, so she will take initiative to do new things.
Malcolm loves to play and this will boost creative ideas.
Frankie likes testing new ideas and will be comfortable working creatively.
Answer:
Correct option is C.
<u>$25,000, $25,000.</u>
Explanation:
Gross profit on sale = (300,000-250,000)/300,000 = 16.67%
Gain recognized in:
Year 1 = 150,000 * 16.67% = 25,000
Year 2 = 150,000 * 16.67% = 25,000
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
This one would be IRS.
For example, if<span> you end up paying for personal property taxes to your local government, the IRS would allow you to claim a deduction for it on your federal tax return~</span>
