Answer: Assembly-line justice.
Explanation:
There is relatively little research testing for racial discrimination in the sentencing of individuals convicted of misdemeanor offenses. Because the lower courts where misdemeanor cases are handled usually have huge caseloads and informal, nonadversarial procedures for delivering what is often referred to as <u>assembly-line justice</u>, one might predict that the likelihood of racially disparate decisions would be even greater in these courts than in the more formal felony courts.
<u>Assembly-line justice</u> is a system of justice in which where we find an static process that does not distinguish any kind of contemplations on a regular case to case basis, as a consequence of this, all cases end up being sorted out the same way.
The answer is D. Legal citizenship
i hope this will help you :D
Answer:
This sort of interaction is inadvisable.
Explanation:
Ms. Malony should have kept in mind that all emails sent through a school computer would be a part of a public record. Personal things cannot be discussed on devices which are for company or public use. The record through these devices can be subpoenaed and strict actions can be taken against people who use such devices for personal talks. Hence, this kind of act should not have been done by Ms. Malony and is highly inadvisable.
<span>B is the most correct answer. Just by existing in certain racial and ethnic classes, a person can have their chances for social mobility increased or decreased without any action or effort of their own. Social strictures in place regarding a person's ethnic background or race can make it easier or harder for a person and their experiences throughout life.</span>
