It is unwise to keep driving at the same speed and cross the herd.
It is best to reduce speed of the vehicle and slow down or even pull over while driving and you come across a herd of cattle on a country road. The reason is simple because driving in the same speed can most likely result in some kind of accident so it is better to be patient and let the herd pass before continuing your driving.
Answer:
One possible answer might be keeping the animals quiet in the event of a surprise attack. Keeping them housed in barracks might be a solution. The type of food they eat and having it available could be a problem also.
Explanation:
its the sample text.
Well its <span>a dark area or shape produced by a body coming between rays of light and a surface.</span>
T was not failed but the systemic progress that should be done was not done by buerocrats at that time. The nepal becomes country with people not land as we have open border policy where checking is done just like other border.The India government open market near to border so that Nepalese buy goods without tax. This kind of things really destroyed concept of open border . The nepal should open border with only some states not whole state of India as madhesi people have language n culture similarities with Bihari people. So this sentiment should be maintained to border just like that Nepalese government used regional development to show world that Nepalese government are doing something for people but in reality it was nothing .
From now until 2025, the structure and policy of the United States government should remain largely the same. For instance, the number of justices on the Supreme Court should remain the same from now to 2025, as it has since 1869. Nine justices work because there are enough to keep each other in check but not too many that the justices are inefficient. (Or at least as inefficient as they would be if more were added.) Filibustering should continue to be allowed. While it is arguably a waste of time, filibustering helps the parties keep each other in check. Gerrymandering should be adjusted if not removed because it takes away the importance of voters in certain districts because they are either so much a majority that they will win either way or so much of a minority that they will lose either way. If gerrymandering was taken away, then the people would have a greater voice in who represents them. Campaign financing is tricky, but I think it may be best if the restrictions were loosened as to who can donate how much but if more transparency was required. There may be political opposition to removing gerrymandering because it allows many politicians to stay in power for a long time without many significant challengers. What we can do, as young citizens, is vote for people who believe in making these changes and petition/lobby for these changes to be made.
