Answer:
Actor/observer bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the actor/observer bias refers to the tendency to attribute our own actions to external causes while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes.
When the results of a situation are negative, if the negative outcome happened to the person, the person will likely attribute the outcome to external circumstances. But when it comes to other people, the person will attribute the outcome to the other person behaviors, habits or actions.
In this example, Jeremiah falls and thinks the ice is brutal. <u>He is attributing the fall to an external circumstance (the ice)</u>. But then, when his friend Ed falls on the same spot, he says his friend is really clumsy, <u>attributing the fall to an inner characteristic of his friend</u>. Therefore, this would be an example of actor/observer bias.
The Appointments Clause [of Article II] clearly implies a power of the Senate to give advice on and, if it chooses to do so, to consent to a nomination, but it says nothing about how the Senate should go about exercising that power. The text of the Constitution thus leaves the Senate free to exercise that power however it sees fit. Throughout American history, the Senate has frequently – surely, thousands of times – exercised its power over nominations by declining to act on them.
The *limbic system* is faster than that of the *prefrontal cortex*
Answer:
<h2>B. They assume the pattern of the past will continue into the future</h2>
Explanation:
Quantitative Forecasting Method is a statistical method used to make prediction about the future by using data and previous effects to predict about the future events.
These methods are based on mathematical models and are mostly objective. They depend on the mathematical calculations. Delphi method, Sales force polling and Consumer surveys are some of the methods used in Quantitative forecasting.
In all the techniques experts study the past patterns and try to predict the future on its basis, the previous pattern may or may not repeat itself.
the answer is: <span>the third variable problem
</span><span>the third variable problem refers to the additional factor that could mistakenly lead to the false conclusion in determining the causal relationship between two other factors.
Other example:
There was a study that shown that eating soy bean leads to the development of breast cancer. But if we take a look at East Asian population who consume more soy beans compared to western people, East Asian population have far less cancer cases.
In this case, we can say that Genetic is a t</span>hird variable problem
