There isn't one but if i had to choose one it would only be if it was an emergency
Answer:
Minutia such as this isn't worth the verbiage that is being devoted to it.
Explanation:
Not everything that might have an adverse effect is intentionally done. What we have here is over-concern, or hyper-concern, on the part of people who are looking for some way to shine with politically correct glory, forever trying to sniff out something that they can blame someone else for, even it that might be not trying hard enough to be progressive.
Quit it, already. Remember: get woke, go broke. On the other hand, if poverty is your thing, and joining the poor is what you want to do, go for it.
You can determine minimum scores or <u>thresholds </u>for specific criteria in a weighted scoring model.
A value-weighted numerical score for possible projects is generated by a weighted scoring model and is specific to the team. You may determine or create a score that aids in project comparison by picking your criteria carefully and allocating weight based on relevance.
The benefit of a weighted scoring methodology is that it enables a team to prioritise specific criteria over others. By using this model, you may stress your unique requirements while still taking into account a number of other factors when making your choice.
To learn more about weighted scoring model, refer
brainly.com/question/24077879
#SPJ4
Answer:
Suppose a bill is passed to make minimum hourly wage as $7.50, the implications would be that:
-If the minimum wage is set at $10.50, the market will not reach equilibrium.
-In the absence of price controls, a shortage puts upward pressure on wages until they rise to the equilibrium.
Therefore only the two above listed statements would be TRUE.
