Answer:
b. work to identify root causes, not just symptoms.
Explanation:
The main thing on which Joseph Juran focused was on quality, how it could be improved in planning, and performing properly.
This provided for the quality controls, plans, improvements which could be made, but it did not work on finding the causes behind the lack that why it could not be achieved.
Accordingly it did not in manner focused on the finding the symptoms or root causes.
As it was focused on the action of now what can be done.
Explanation:
1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.
2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable
Measurable:
Experience on the job,
Productivity
Level of education,
immeasurable :
Skill set
Vision
Likeliness to bstay at firm
3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.
4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.
Inventory cost is higher than all other options. If there are many small players at the customer stage, each requiring small amount of the product at a time.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": a market in which a good can be bought and sold at the same price.
Explanation:
Competitive markets are those with large numbers of producers fighting against each other to fulfill consumers' needs. In these markets, the producers and consumers cannot determine the price of the goods or services being traded. Both <em>participants are price-takers</em> which imply they will come to a point in which the price level offered by producers and desired by consumers will be equal.
Answer:
The solution shows that a rate of return of 10% which provides an annuity factor of 4.868 generates an NPV which is equal to zero. Thus, our IRR or internal rate of return is 10%.
Explanation:
The IRR or internal rate of return is the rate at which NPV or Net Present Value of the investment becomes zero. We are provided with the initial outlay for the project and the annual cash inflows along with time period. Using the annuity factors given below, we need to find out the factor which makes the NPV zero. The NPV is calculated as follows,
NPV = Present Value of Cash Inflows - Initial Outlay
We can try out each annuity factor and see what NPV is generates.
1. 6% rate (Annuity factor = 5.582)
NPV = (30000 * 5.582) - 146040
NPV = $21420
2. 8% rate (Annuity factor = 5.206)
NPV = (30000 * 5.206) - 146040
NPV = $10140
3. 10% rate (Annuity factor = 4.868)
NPV = (30000 * 4.868) - 146040
NPV = $0
So, from the above solution we can see that a rate of return of 10% which provides an annuity factor of 4.868 generates an NPV which is equal to zero. Thus, our IRR or internal rate of return is 10%
