Answer:
b. $1.87
Explanation:
Number of order taking costs = $20,592
Number of orders = 187,200
Cost of activity
= $20,592 ÷ 187,200
= $0.11
The Statement of overhead allocated is given below:-
Number of orders = 17
Cost per activity = $0.11
Cost
= 17 × $0.11
= $1.87
Therefore, the overhead is applied to the Tucker family account for order taking costs $1.87
I think the answer is false because many schools raise fundraisers to help pay for things. If this is the case the money for the school will be quite low
Answer:
C. $40,000
Explanation:
For computing the amount of the gain recognized, first we have to calculate the gain recognized based on the adjusted basis
= Cash received + fair market value of the stock - adjusted cash basis
= $40,000 + $60,000 - $35,000
= $100,000 -$35,000
= $65,000
But the cash is received for $40,000. So, only $40,000 of gain would be recognized. As in the case of transfer, if the amount is received other than the stock so the amount which is received is recognized as a gain i.e $40,000
Answer:
Option (a) and (b) are considered or correct.
Explanation:
Under the following two conditions, a firm in a perfectly competitive market produces at a point where the marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost:
(i) Minimum AVC < Price < minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, a firm may suffer a loss but it will be able to cover its minimum average variable cost. Hence, this firm continue operating in this market and if he shut down its operation then he may suffer a larger loss. Therefore, it chooses to continue operating under this market conditions.
(ii) Price > minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, the price received by the seller is greater than the minimum average total cost. Therefore, the firm is able to cover all of its cost of production and earning an economic profit. Hence, it obviously chooses to continue its operation.
The third option is not considered here because in this case, the firm won't be able to cover its variable cost.
Answer:
Consultation.
Explanation:
In the scenario observed in the question, it can be seen that the dean used the consultation tactic.
This tactic can be defined as the influencing leader seeking support from others to influence a group. This is an effective approach to increase group satisfaction due to the value of democratic decision-making.
The benefits of this technique are described in the question, such as the increased commitment of the faculty, who are now interested in seeing the process succeed and the objective of accreditation fulfilled.
