I believe the answer is: <span>Thought stopping
</span><span>Thought stopping refers to a therapy technique that is aimed to remove problematic thought that might be the source of the patient's psychological problem.
In the scenario above, this problematic thought came from the falsehood which make bella believed she would always got laughed at and causing the anxiety problem toward her</span>
Answer:
The answer is d. An analysis of data he has already collected.
Explanation:
An analysis of data already collected is NOT likely part of Farat's shared plan because he has not yet started the research: Farat has not gone to the field and collected data about the reading practices of Turkish families; hence he does not yet have any data to analyze. Generally, when anybody is preparing a proposal for a new research, it is not possible to submit field data, and the analysis of field data.
Answer:Their treatment of Alison most clearly illustrates Ostracism.
Explanation:
Ostracism occurs when a social group intentionally excludes someone and does not accept them as member of the group.
This forms part of social rejection when one is not being welcomed within a group or by a certain individual if this continues for a long time an ostracized individual may start to feel lonely which may lead to depression or aggression.
Like Alison is being ignored and excluded from after school activities which may make her be a loner and start to feel unworthy or if may start to make her violent towards others as a defensive mechanism or a way of taking her emotions out.
The current chronological order is:
First, Israel takes control of West Bank and Gaza. This starts to happen and mainly takes place in 1967. Secondly, Israel and the PLO sign the Oslo Accords. This fact occuered in 1993 in the frame of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process. Finally, Israel withdraws from Gaza which happens just in 2005.
The position described in the quote (governor) compares closest to the U.S. president. Governors are the chief executive officers of the fifty states and five commonwealths and territories. They are, in other words, the managers and leaders of the states, so they are comparable to the U.S. president, although on a smaller scale.