Answer:
Explanation idea generation
Answer: Benjamin Franklin did not have cars during his time good sir...
Explanation:
Answer:
Establish the mission and vision and values
Explanation:
When former CEO kalanick’s question of ""what kind of brand do we want to be?", it represents the Establishing the mission and vision and values stage of the strategic management process. Strategic management is the process which involves setting goals and objectives, the analyzing and evaluating the outside and internal environment by evaluating the existed strategies.
Following are the step of strategic management process:
1: Vision and objectives are set.
2: Gathering and analyzing of the information.
3: Strategy formulation in order to attain the set vision and objectives.
4: Implementation of the strategy.
5: Evaluation and Control.
Here in this case, what kind of brand we want to be, represents the setting of the vision, mission and objectives for the brand, putting it simply, setting the direction for the brand, where we want to be, how we want customers to see us.
Answer:
Cost of equity= 10,50%
Explanation:
The cost of equity is the return a company requires to decide if an iThe cost of equity is the return a company requires to decide if an investment meets capital return requirements. A firm's cost of equity represents the compensation the market demands in exchange for owning the asset and bearing the risk of ownership.
Cost of equity= (D1/P0)+g
D1= next year dividend (D0*
P0=actual price
g= growth rate of dividends
In this exercise:
D1=D0*(1+g)=0,90*1,07=$0,963
P0=$27,50
g=0,07
Cost of equity= 0,963/27,5+0,07=0,1051=10,50%
Answer: d. Decision-making lag
Explanation:
When policy makers have identified that there is a problem that needs fixing but cannot seem to agree on the way forward, this is known as a <em>Decision - Making Lag or simply the Decision Lag.</em> It is one of the 3 specific inside Policy Lags and can be devastating due to the uncertainty of time it might take.
For instance, the economists suggesting dropping the federal funds rate by 0.25% might have the backing of one half of the Fed and the other Economists, the other half. Arguments could therefore go on for weeks before a decision is made.
