Answer:
Hello Friend, I've done my personal research, and I apologize if the answer is incorrect.
The natural unemployment would be 5%.
Explanation:
The percentages of both kinds of employment statuses have an amount of what the natural rate of unemployment would be 5% which is the answer that is provided.
Answer:
Salary systems – also referred to as compensation plans or pay structure – are a collection of steps, policies and practices employers use to pay employees for their work. Salary systems consist of more than producing a weekly, biweekly or bimonthly paycheck.
Explanation:
Answer:
7.86%
Explanation:
The computation of the capital gain yield on the investment is shown below:
As we know that
Capital gains yield is
= (Selling price per share × number of shares purchased) ÷ (Stock value) - 1
= $3,500 ÷ $3,245 - 1
= 0.07858
= 7.86%
We simply applied the above formula so that the capital gain yield could come and the same is to be considered
In this scenario, Barry would be classified as a(n) <u>A. aggressive</u> salesperson.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Barry works for a popular radio station as a sales representative. From his conversation in the above scenario it is clear that Barry is an aggressive salesperson.
One day Barry was discussing with the marketing manager of a larger retail store regarding their new ad program. Barry was clear that the ad will be broadcasted around the clock all over the town if they agree with their radio station. He told that the ad will be aired day after tomorrow if the manager is ready to sign today.
Answer:The answer is a
Explanation:
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties which contains the terms and conditions of the contract and which also serve as an evidence that the two parties in the contract has a duty to perform to each other. The terms and conditions of the contract can be enforced in the court of law in case of a breach of contract which may come from either parties in the contract agreement. While, a contract interference is a kind of breach of contract in which one vendor put a pressure on the organization in which they offer service to withdraw from the contract the organization earlier had with one of their competitors in the market. This contract interference can occur when a vendor either force or put a financial inducement on the organization with a view to make them consider their proposal to the organization to eventually agree to abandon the contract they had with their competitors in favour of getting the contract instead of their competitors who should get the contract.
Therefore, from what we can deduce from the question under review, it is clear that A plus linen has engage in contract interference by offering John C Lincoin hospital $5 for every 100 pound of linen they send to them by dropping their current linen service.
