Answer: $20,478.78
Explanation:
In 14 years the investment will be,
Gold
10,000/2 = 5000
Then use the compound interest formula
5000 * (1+0.07)^ 14 = $12,892.67
For Certificates of Deposits.
Use the Compound interest formula
Rate and period are in years. Convert to semi annual basis.
3%/ 2 = 1.5%
14 * 2 = 28 periods
= 5000 ( 1+ 0.015) ^ 28
= $7,586.11
Add both
=$12,892.67 + $7,586.11
= $20,478.78
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
For her it is a specialty good because it not sold everywhere, therefore she makes the extra effort.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
Ethical Dilemma
Explanation:
According to my research on different managerial roles and responsibilities, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Eumi is experiencing an Ethical Dilemma. This is because like mentioned in the question Eumi can either choose the morally right option which is choosing the more expensive safer product, or choosing the less safe - less expensive option which will increase her bonus, which would be ethically wrong.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
command economy
Explanation:
In a command economy, the government is the only determinant of what is to be produced, its quantity, and price. All the factors of production belong to the government. The government or the central authority creates a central plan that guides all country's economic activities and decisions.
The private sector is absent in a command economy. The government is the only employer. Citizens do not have the freedom to choose what to buy, but rather what is available.
