The answer is A) roman common law
Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.
Answer:
A productive and harmonious relationship between the board and management is critical for good governance and organisational effectiveness. The board expects management to accept that the board's role is to monitor and question, probe issues, seek clarification, offer insight and share its knowledge and experience whilst the ministry represents the decisions and are the face of the government.
Explanation:
