Answer:
Explanation:
The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.
Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.
Answer:
Emergency communications
Explanation:
The CERT programs offers foundational training to volunteers on several emergency situations and how to handle them individually and collectively and also on how to help prevent the emergencies from escalating. therefore aside from emergency flood response another subject matter that the sponsoring organization should train the Volunteers on Emergency communications.
The best action that can be taken by a labor union of small businesses will be to reach out to their government to aid these businesses in a lawful way
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the best action for small
businesses?</h3>
Generally, People who are dissatisfied with their situation have two options: first, they can join a labor union and participate in strikes and other disruptive actions;
In conclusion, they can write a letter to the government describing how they feel. If they want the letter to carry more weight, they should have the letter notarized, as this will ensure that it is taken seriously.
Read more about small businesses
brainly.com/question/13424073
#SPJ1
Complete question options are not found in the search engine
I think it’s the first one
That would go against the 10th amendment say states make their own laws
