Answer:
The estimated inventory at the end of February is $73400 as shown below
Explanation:
Beginning Inventory $57,800
Plus: Net purchases $120000
Freight-in $2,700
Cost of Goods Available for Sale $180500
less: Cost of Goods Sold
Net Sales$180000
Less Estimated Gross Profit $81000
Estimated Cost of Goods Sold $99000
Estimated Inventory before Theft 81500
Less: Stolen Inventory 8,100
Estimated Ending Inventory 73400
Gross profit $180000*45%=$81000
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The reason is that the betas are calculated using the past data which means that the Capital asset pricing model solely rely on the past data which is not the strength of the CAPM. It is basically a weakness of the model so the statement is incorrect.
Answer:
b. set in when the fifth worker is hired
After this point additional worker return will be lower.
Explanation:
Trhe diminishing return are the moment at which the marginal increase in production decrease.
In other words, adding a new resource provide less return than his predecessor.
Marginal
2 do 4 hours
3 do 6 houses (marginal 6 - 4 = 2)
4 do 9 houses (marginal 9 - 6 = 3)
5 do 13 houses (marginal 13 - 9 = 4)
6 do 15 houses (marginal 15 - 13 = 2)
the marginal output decrease from 4 to 2 the returns decreased.
Answer:
social norms
Explanation:
Social norms can be seen as mutual depictions of appropriate social behavior as well as internal opinions of specific group behavior. Norms can be seen as cultural ideas (including principles, traditions, and rituals) that serve a basic understanding of what others practice and believe that they ought to be doing.
Social norms are, if seen as a societal viewpoint, informal interpretations which regulate the actions of people in a society. In response to religious or community expectations, behavioral economics acknowledges smaller group structures (such as a team or perhaps a department) can also accept norms independently.
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
