The answer is C) An explanation is informative, while an argument is persuasive. When someone is explaining something to you, they are giving you facts. They are trying to teach you with facts, not opinions. On the other hand, an argument is persuasive. They are trying to get you to take their side. It is not fact, it is opinion. Your answer is C.
~Deceptiøn
The conclusion which is supported by the excerpt about pau Amma is; Choice 3; He likes to follow his own path.
<h3>Which conclusion about pau Amma does the excerpt support?</h3>
Evidence from.tge excerpt suggests that; Pau Amma scuttled into the sea and said to himself; "I will play my play alone in the deep waters....". It therefore follows that the conclusion about Pau Amma according to the excerpt is; He likes to follow his own path.
Read more on excerpts;
brainly.com/question/24864502
#SPJ1
<span>the exposition is the idea or theory behind the book so "whats the book about"
a rising action is a series of events that build up to the climax so
example" he looked and looked for his dog.. but then he found his collar"
the climax is the turning point in his story
example" he found the dogs collar and tracks"
the falling action would be a conflict that unravels with the main character " the dog"
example would be like " he finally found the dog, "why did you leave spot"asked the boy
" cause you said you would get rid of him" said the tramp
the resolution would be the end of the story
"I am sorry spot" said the boy "i will never get rid of you"</span>
I just finished the test,
<u>C. "He heard the bleating of the flock, / And the twitter of birds among the trees, / And felt the breath of the morning breeze"</u>
is your answer !
