Answer:
The best answer to the question: An important insight that can be drawn from the research on happiness is that:___, would be, C: Objective realities are not as important as subjective feelings.
Explanation:
For a very long time, different fields of study, especially in the social sciences, have become interested in learning about what happiness is, how it is defined, what defines it, and what makes people perceive themselves as happy and what factors of life, both inside a person, and outside, play a role in the perception of happiness. Although happiness is essentially a very subjective and intangible concept, and its perception varies from one person to another, what studies on happiness have found though are certain common denominators among people who perceive themselves as happy, or unhappy. One such common denominator is the role that objective realities: having money, having a good job, a country doing well, play on the perception of happiness vs. subjective feelings. And the conclusions that have been drawn show that people perceive happiness more from subjective feelings than from objective realities, meaning, happiness in part depends on a person´s feelings, rather than what is measurable, tangible, and objective.
George's inference is an example of the "
Assumed Similarity Bias".Assumed
Similarity Bias is a psychological easy route
that leads us to the oblivious presumption that others share the same or
comparative qualities, considerations and convictions. We naturally accept that
others are much the same as we are, particularly with regards to the crucial
parts of our characters that are so fundamental we never at any point give them
a second thought.
Answer:
Stereotype has a negative connotation. But a stereotype is simply a generalization about how a group of people behaves. It may be statistically accurate but not universally valid. Many believe we shouldn't make decisions a ecting an individual based on a stereotype, even if it is statistically accurate.
give him brianlist
Explanation:
I'd probably lean towards "installment plan". As the number of stores grew across the nation and more products became available, they began looking at different ways to get people to buy more even if they didn't have all of the cash at the moment. So as one store offered up an installment plan to help pay off that new car, fridge, or whatever, other stores were forced to compete allowing more people to get even more stuff. It's a tricky question because there were also early credit cards available at the this point in time, but installment plans are based on roughly the same concept - allowing people to buy on credit with a promise to pay everything off at a later date. As I see it, though, instead of having to sign up for a specific card you could walk into any store with an installment plan and get what you wanted
Mixtures can be separated by physical changes;True.
