Answer:
cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021 cancelkeyyon2021
Step-by-step explanation:
Its 72.. its just 75/100 = x/96 then use cross products to find out that 74(96)=100x then solve to get 72
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
I think number 2 is the answer, but 4 could be the answer.
Danny's score at the end of the game is 30 because:
We started our with 10 points.
He loses 20 points, which brings him down to -10 points.
In the final round he earned 40 points. 40 minus the negative ten points gives us an answer of 30 points.