The foreign policy would have a strong nationalistic component, and alliances and treaties would only be formed when they were advantageous to American Indian policy.
<h3>What did alliances in World War 1 mean?</h3>
A WW1 alliance system. As previously established, the definition of alliances WW1 is a pact between a group of nations to aid one another in times of conflict. Before the conflict started, the alliance structure for WW1 was established. Some alliance systems go all the way back to the nineteenth century.
<h3>What kind of alliances are examples of?</h3>
One of the best examples of a strategic partnership is the agreement between Starbucks with Barnes & Noble. Coffee is brewed by Starbucks. Books can be found at Barnes & Noble. To a benefit of the both businesses, each one does what it does best while splitting the costs of the facility.
To know more about alliances visit:
brainly.com/question/28195787
#SPJ4
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Answer:
Yes and no.
Explanation:
Yes because he could have been forced into this.
No because there could be parental consent.
Answer:
The judgement will base on the crime committed
