Answer:
26th
Explanation:
Right after William McKinley and right before William Howard Taft. Hope this helped :)
Answer:
The correct answer is (A. Trustees' Governmental Principles
Explanation:
I know thus because I got it correct on my test and because James Oglethorpe was in the leader of the trustee, he helped create principles for Georgia in the 1730's
The Missouri Compromise is the act of Congress set the line of latitude at 36 degrees 30 minutes north, as the northernmost limit for slavery. Hence, option B is correct.
<h3>What is the
Missouri compromise?</h3>
Slavery was outlawed in the remaining Louisiana Purchase areas north of the 36o 30' parallel after the U.S. Congress approved a statute in 1820 that accepted Maine as a free state and made Missouri a slave state while maintaining slavery in Missouri as a slave state.
The controversy around slavery gave rise to the Missouri Compromise. A bill that made Missouri a slave state in the Union had been passed.
Before the Kansa-Nebraska Act of 1854 overturned it, this agreement had been in existence for more than 30 years. In 1857, the compromise was declared to be unconstitutional.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about Missouri compromise, click here:
brainly.com/question/24314740
#SPJ1
It was caused by collectivization. The food was gathered and taken away from all lands of Ukrainian people by the Soviet Union and people starved. But political debates also contributed to this famine.
Explanation:
The Great Famine of 1932-1933 wasn't solely the end result<span> of </span>constitution however conjointly a crucial plan of action<span> in </span>status policy<span>, </span>an effort<span> by the Soviet Regime </span>to unravel<span> its Ukrainian </span>drawback<span> once and for all. Firstly the liquidation of the kulaks - </span>the higher<span> off peasants - was a politically </span>impelled<span> act of lunacy. The kulaks </span>weren't happier as a result of<span> they were exploiting the </span>employees<span> - </span>because the<span> Bolsheviks argued - </span>however<span>, in truth, they were </span>happier as a result of<span> they were </span>higher<span> farmers. By removing them from the land, and imposing </span>town<span> born, politically trained managers on the farms, Ukrainian agricultural output fell. </span>
<span>Secondly the peasants themselves, </span>inadvertently<span>, helped </span>to form<span> the famine worse. </span>so as to forestall<span> the collective from taking their </span>eutherian<span> and grain surpluses, they destroyed them. This meant that there was no food store </span>to examine<span> them through any worse times.</span>
