This statement is the most accurate:
<span>They were considered property; similar to a horse. </span>
Answer:
a
Explanation:
it mentions it in the first sentence. i really hope this helps:))
I'm going to keep it short, mainly because my fingers are starting to hurt really bad. The Israelites understood and agreed with the prophets teachings about God. They even followed the instructions, but after a while, they started to drift away from doing the instructions the prophets taught. Then when they noticed that their God was mad at them for not following instructions, they'd ask for forgiveness and keep it again, then drift away. It's like a cycle, you know?
Hope this helps! :)
The statement that is not true about Archbishop William Laud's action is that "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglican."
This is evident in that Archbishop William Laud was famous for being an Anglican in terms of doctrine.
He used his position to ensure people in England and Scotland practiced the Anglican doctrine, which sparked riots in Scotland, and later led to Bishop wars.
The major action he did was to push protestants orthodox practices to the Puritans.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglicans."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/715752
Answer:
Thanks!
Explanation:
oday, it may seem impossible to imagine the U.S. government without its two leading political parties, Democrats and Republicans. But in 1787, when delegates to the Constitutional Convention gathered in Philadelphia to hash out the foundations of their new government, they entirely omitted political parties from the new nation’s founding document.
This was no accident. The framers of the new Constitution desperately wanted to avoid the divisions that had ripped England apart in the bloody civil wars of the 17th century. Many of them saw parties—or “factions,” as they called them—as corrupt relics of the monarchical British system that they wanted to discard in favor of a truly democratic government.
“It was not that they didn’t think of parties,” says Willard Sterne Randall, professor emeritus of history at Champlain College and biographer of six of the Founding Fathers. “Just the idea of a party brought back bitter memories to some of them.”
