Answer:
$24,000
Explanation:
Product A Product B Product C
sales 70,000 97000
Variable cost 37000 51000
Contribution margin 33000 46000
Avoidable cost 10,000 20000
Unavoidable cost 7000 12000 9400
Operating income 16000 14000
Total operating income if product C is dropped is (16000+14000 +3400-9400)
=$24000
Please note that Giant company with still incur the unavoidable cost even if the product is dropped. This is assumed to be a portion of the fixed overhead expenses allocated to the product in the course of normal operation.However , the loss made of 3400 will be avoided as well
Answer:
sources of business revenue
Explanation:
Revenue is the money a business gets from its normal trading activities. It is the income a business obtains through the sales of goods and services to customers. Revenue includes discounts received and purchase returns.
The sale of an asset is revenue to a business because it will receive money from the transaction. Usage fees, Brokerage fees, and advertising are money that businesses receive for offering services.
Answer:
$2,200
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what should this recent grad be willing to pay in rent per month
First step is to calculate the work days
Using this formula
Work days = 5 days per week x 1 hour to work+ 1 hour from work
Let plug in the formula
Work days = 5 days a week x 2 hours
Work days= 10 hours
The second step is to calculate the monthly commuting in a standard month of 4 weeks
Monthly commuting = 4 x 10 hours
Monthly commuting = 40 hours
Third step is to calculate hourly how much she will be able to maximize
Amount maximize = $25 x 40 hours (commuting hours)
Amount maximize= $1,000
Now let determine The total she will be willing to pay in rent
Rent per month= $1,200 + $1,000
Rent per month=$2,200
Therefore what should this recent grad be willing to pay in rent per month is $2,200
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.