Answer: All of the options are correct.
Explanation:
The Allowance for Doubtful Account is a contra account because it reduces the value of the Accounts Receivable Account and does so in order to account for the possibility that some customers will not pay the amounts they owe.
It is credited when Bad debts are estimated and recorded; that way this reduction in Accounts receivable does not have to go out of the Accounts Receivable account directly.This will ensure that the Accounts Receivable Account is not volatile as it attempts to keep up with all the bad debts incurred.
<u>Answer:</u> Consolidation
<u>Explanation:</u>
Courts have the authority to consolidate the cases which have common concern. Consolidated case also does not mean the court will not hear each appeal separately. As the facts of the case are similar that they have not received their prepaid wedding gowns due to the bankruptcy of the bridal store single hearing is placed by the court.
The consolidated cases at first remain the same way but the arguments of the attorneys may diverge the case while appealing. The disappointed brides should receive their compensation at once from the failed store here.,
Answer:
1. 690
2. Do not reject the null hypothesis.
Explanation:
1. Month t
At the end of Feb 6
March 4
April 4
May 4
June 2
14th of July 2
Total 24
Therefore on 14th July, t = 24
Forecast: Y = 450+10t = 450 + 10*24 = 450+240 = 690
2. Options are <em>"a. Reject the null hypothesis. b. Do not reject the null hypothesis. c. Take a larger sample. d. Reserve judgment"</em>
In general, if test statistic is more extreme than the critical values at given level of significance then we reject the null hypothesis otherwise we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Here, test statistic for the given two tailed test is Z = -1.07 and critical value at level of significance α = 0.5 is ± 1.96 . Since -1.96<Z<1.96, we can say that we do not reject Null Hypothesis as the test statistic is not extreme than the critical value at given level of significance.
