All categories

2 years ago

What is the outcome when employees have positive attitudes towards their jobs?

Business

2 answers:

ivolga24 [154]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The outcome when employees have positive attitudes towards their jobs are discussed below.

Explanation:

A positive work attitude is an attitude about working. It is often referred to as someone who has a positive outlook and behavior towards work.

The Benefits of the Positive attitude

It encourages your ability to work with diverse people.
It encourages higher self-esteem and confidence.
It increases the ability to challenge stress and increase positive energy.
It increases the higher productivity of an Individual.

vovikov84 [41]2 years ago

3 0

When employees have positive attitudes towards their jobs they become very productive. They start to understand the goal of the company and together work to achieve success. Problems will be minimized and will make way for a clear road to profit. This means expansion of the company, better benefits for employees, higher salaries. Most importantly job security.

You might be interested in

Miller Mining, a calendar-year corporation, purchased the rights to a copper mine on July 1, Year 1. Of the total purchase price

dybincka [34]

Answer: $4,500

Explanation:

Equipment was purchased for $76,000.

It has an estimated useful life of 8 years.

It will be sold for $4,000 after these 8 years so that is the salvage value.

With these figures depreciation per annum is calculated with the following formula;

$Depreciation per annum = \frac{Cost of Asset - Salvage Value}{Useful life}$

= $\frac{76,000 - 4,000}{8}$

= $9,000

The Equipment was purchased on July 1, Year 1. In Year 1 therefore it will only be in use for half the year and this is what it should b depreciated in light of.

Semi-annual Depreciation = 9,000/2

= $4,500

7 0

2 years ago

Maddie's shoe store donated hundreds of pairs of shoes to needy children at an inner city school. A news crew reported on the do

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

publicity

Explanation:

Publicity involves creating an excellent reputation for a company's brand name. Publicly arises from positives messages from the media, and other sources such as the internet and word of mouth. An organization engages in activities that create a good relationship with the media and the public to build the desired publicity.

Publicity messages are not paid for, unlike advertising. In the case of Maddie, the business was engaged in a charitable event. The event was captured in the press, and Maddie brand name was mentioned, thus promoting its brand name.

3 0

3 years ago

Last year, Cayman Corporation had sales of $7,000,000, total variable costs of $3,000,000, and total fixed costs of $1,500,000.

UNO [17]

Answer:

b. 13.9%

Explanation:

sales 7,000,000

variable cost (3,000,000)

contribution 4,000,000

fixed cost (1,500,000)

interest (480,000)

EBT 2,020,000

tax expense (707,000)

net income 1,313,000

contribution margin 4,000,000 / 7,000,000 = 4/7

if sales increase by 7%:

7,000,000 x 0.07 x 4/7 x (1- 0.35) = 182,000

income after increase in sales: 1,313,000 + 182,000 = 1,495,000

increase in earnings: 1,495,000 / 1,313,000 - 1 = 0.138613861 = 13.9%

3 0

2 years ago

From the standpoint of the issuing company, a disadvantage of using bonds as a means of long-term financing is that

kumpel [21]

Answer:

interest must be paid on a periodic basis regardless of earnings

Explanation:

Businesses need funds to operate and they sometimes issue bonds to get the needed bonds.

Bonds are debt instruments that are sold to investors to get funds. Interest is also paid to the bond buyer for the tenure of the bond.

The major disadvantage of using bonds as a source of bonds from the standpoint of the issuer is that interest must be paid on a periodic basis regardless of earnings.

6 0

2 years ago

Bill currently uses his entire budget to purchase 5 cans of Pepsi and 3 hamburgers per week. The price of Pepsi is $1 per can,

FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:

$\frac{MU_x}{P_x}=\frac{MU_y}{P_y}$

It is given that,

price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can

price of a hamburger(y) = $2

Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4

Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6

Hence,

$\frac{4}{1}>\frac{6}{2}$

4 > 3

Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.

Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.

So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.

6 0

2 years ago