Answer:
-$8,600
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Distributions = $44,000
Basis = $42,000
Amount of ordinary income allocated = $10,600
Now,
Capital gain from distribution in excess of basis
= Distribution - Basis - Amount of ordinary income allocated
= $44,000 - $42,000 - $10,600
= -$8,600
here, negative sign depicts there is a capital loss
Answer & Explanation:
In terms of completion of goals, the key difference between strategic aim and SWOT is the time-frame.
In this case, the strategic goal is future-oriented and long-term (around 10-20 years). The strategic goal is simply to make sure that the whole enterprise, in order to meet potential business demand, works on forecasting consumer demand in the future, reinforcing and enhancing its core competences.
On the other side, in implementing the corporate goals and achieving success, SWOT has a short-term outlook. In this context, SWOT focuses on current data and knowledge, such as specific expertise, current business demand and satisfying this need.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": the Macro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing fishing boats, and the Micro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing guava jelly.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is an advantage an individual, organization or country has to use <em>opportunity costs</em> in their production compared to their competitors. The scenario described above does not imply that the individual, organization or country has an absolute advantage.
In the example proposed:
- Comparative advantage of Macro islands in fishing boats =
- Comparative advantage of Micro islands in fishing boats =
- Comparative advantage of Macro islands in jars =
- Comparative advantage of Micro islands in jars =
Thus, <em>the Macro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing fishing boats, and the Micro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing guava jelly.</em>
I would buy a Chromebook. I would buy a Chromebook because I would be able to do stuff like school work and it would be very helpful so that way I wouldn’t have to narrow my moms Chromebook. That is what I would buy with a million dollars.
Martha cannot sue the baker.
Explanation: Here in this case there is not contract or agreement or promise made by the baker. For being in a contract two parties must be there and hey must agree on the terms mutually. In this case, baker never agreed on any of her statement which means it was one sided and consideration was from Martha's side not the from the baker's side.
