Answer:
(we need the mass of the astronaut A)
Explanation:
We can solve this by using the conservation law of the linear momentum P. First we need to represent every mass as a particle. Also we can simplify this system of particles by considering only the astronaut A with an initial speed 
of 0 m/s and a mass 
and the IMAX camera with an initial speed 
of 7.5 m/s and a mass 
of 15.0 kg.
The law of conservation says that the linear momentum P (the sum of the products between all masses and its speeds) is constant in time. The equation for this is:
By the law of conservation we know that 
For 
(final linear momentum) we need to treat the collision as a plastic one (the two particles stick together after the encounter).
So:
Answer: When a car is struck by lightning, the resulting electric field inside the car is zero.
Explanation:
Answer:
(a) 1.11sec
(b) 14.37m/s
(c) 31.78m
Explanation:
U = 18m/s, A = 37°, g = 9.8m/s^2
(a) t = UsinA/g = 18sin37°/9.8 = 18×0.6018/9.8 = 1.11sec
(b) Ux = UcosA = 18cos37° = 18×0.7986 = 14.37m/s
(c) R = U^2sin2A/g = 18^2sin2(37°)/9.8 = 324sin74°/9.8 = 324×0.9613/9.8 = 31.78m
Continental
drift. This Theory was invented by Alfred Wegener.
<span>His
hypothesis was that the continents move relative to each other on the tectonic
plate and so they drift. The drifting and folding of the continents results in pushing
up huge mountains.</span>
If the potential energy of the three-object system is to be a maximum (closest to zero), should object 3 be placed closer to object 1, closer to object 2, or halfway between them?
If the potential energy of the three-object system is to be a maximum (closest to zero), should object 3 be placed closer to object 1, closer to object 2, or halfway between them?
Object 3 should be placed closer to object 1.
Object 3 should be placed on a halfway between object 2 and object 1.
Object 3 should be placed closer to object 2.
Solution
I think that Object 3 should be placed closer to object 2.
