Answer:C because if you are talking about two thing it would be more colorful than the other but if you’re talking about more than two that makes it c!
That plant is the most colorful plant in the entire greenhouse! Make sense?
Answer:
bguitdtychgvjbkhipju0-re7w5aetrzdf;jop0796857e6w5atrzdfvbvmbj,nkjopu9y857ewaetzdfvgjdtugch
Explanation:
Answer:
Emily Dickenson wrote about problems and thoughts of women in her time, their struggle to subjugation to men, and marriage. She paints the images of real, honest women, but remains critical of the expectations that are put onto them.
Explanation:
Emily Dickinson lived in the 19th century, during a time in which women had barely any rights and were not supposed to be independent. Women were supposed to marry and live agreeable life in accordance with their husbands.
<u>However, Dickinson was nonconformist, almost seen as rebellious – she wanted independence and never did marry. </u>
<u>This attitude of hers is evident in her poems</u>. For example, in the poem Poem #732 (“She rose to His Requirement”) she writes about the mildness of women who subdue to patriarchy and are intimidated by the dominant men. It is the poem that <u>speaks of the hardship of the women and their status in society.</u> “I gave myself to him” similarly takes the viewpoint of the married woman who bows down to her husband, and paints the marriage almost as the pure financial transaction and the mutual agreement – but also the risk. We do not see much of the gain for the woman, as she talks of depreciation and ownership.
<u>Her poems paint the critical image of the marriage and dominance of the men, and, as such, try to accent the problems of women in society. </u>Indecently, Dickinson does not paint independent, strong women – she rather presents them as mild and regretful, fighting in their sphere, trying to comprehend their emotions. She has produced the real image of women of her time, along <u>with their struggles and inner problems, but she also sends the critical and analytical message that makes the reader think about women’s role and position.</u>
Answer:
The speaker, most likely a fisherman, describes the act of pulling a fish from the water to discover that a hawk´s bones are attached to it.
Explanation:
The tone in the first section of the poem is grim. The speaker describes the most gruesome part of nature: the death of both the fish and the hawk. The first one lacking the water it needs to survive, the other most likely swallowed by the current. In the second part of the poem, the speaker turns to a more cheerful tone to describe the beauty of water.
We may never know what comes in the future but I believe it is alright to try to shape it to have the best outcome possible. There is no better way to try and shape the future than setting goals. The main type of goals I will support are long term goals that will land you in your dream job. Even though long term goals might stress you out, it is very important to set goals for the future so you know what to aim for at each step of the way to your dream job. Even with counterclaims such as goals being too stressful, the is barely to no evidence to prove that so I believe setting goals is the right choice.
When setting goals, your are likely to have a bigger chance for success as demonstrated in a 2015 study by psychologist Gail Matthews that showed when people wrote down their goals, they were 33 percent more successful in achieving them than those who formulated outcomes in their head. Along with this, your goals for landing in your dream job will be the target to aim for. Without goals you might stumble upon more problems than when you have established goals to aim for. The difference between setting goals and formulating the outcome in your head is like setting up a target to shoot in a shooting range and just imagining a target. Obviously, you would be more successful when actually setting up a target. The same applies with goals, you are more successful when you actually set a goal.
Even with reason alone, you could infer that setting goals would most likely land you in your dream job. With goals you know what to shoot for and know how to get there. For example, if you want to become a doctor, your goals might be to complete an undergraduate education, pass MCAT examination, apply for medical school, and etc. Therefore, with these actually goals you can succeed in becoming a doctor because you know what to aim for. In addition to all the evidence, studies have shown that goals can motivate you and organize the path towards success.
Some counterclaims against goals are mostly based on feelings and not actually evidence. One example of this is the counterclaim that goals are too strict and don't give enough wiggle room. This is false because when setting goals, how you reach them is completely on how you want to reach them. Another counterclaim is that goals are too stressful and not worthwhile. This is also false due to the fact that you will have a higher success rate when setting goals and again, how stressful the goals might be is up to you.
Overall it is best to have goals set in stone to allow your self to succeed. One important factor is that goals are PROVEN to higher your success rate. Also if you don't set goals, you could be doing something wrong which could eventually affect your success in getting your dream job. If you use your reasoning skills you could infer that setting goals is the right way to go. Even though there are counterclaims, they are wrong because they are based on feelings and not actual evidence. If you set goals you can achieve anything with enough time.
HOPE THIS HELPS!!
