Answer: It is called irresistible impulse standard.
Explanation:
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the individual states that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions that broke the law, because they were not able to control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong.
Answer: All the options are correct.
Explanation:
A society is a group of people who share a culture, a physical space or a certain time. Social change occurs when something in the structure of society changes causing the interaction between the social group to change.
Among the factors that affect society is lag culture and technology, this change occurs when technology advances faster than cultural change so that culture changes to adapt as quickly as possible to technological change.
Also, the physical environment can produce a social change; in societies where there have been great physical changes (for example due to an earthquake), society changes as a means of adapting to changes in the environment.
Finally, the change of the values and beliefs of the social group can produce a social change, this has been observed after great social events, for example a war, which causes the values and beliefs to change greatly.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
Well, Like most it was probably Political, economic, and Military Strength. Theodora took after many with her empire, all wanting to build a civilization.
They were independent people who didn't government inferring with their daily lives
