1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
geniusboy [140]
3 years ago
9

Match the events to the appropriate administration? [Picture]

History
1 answer:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
5 0

Washington:

Whiskey Rebellion-tax protest in the early 1790s during Washington's time in office.

The Start of the French Revolution

The First National Bank established by Alexander Hamilton

Adams:

XYZ Affair

Quasi War (naval battles between the US and France)



You might be interested in
How dose the government and economic power interacted between each other.
Crank
I answered your question:) 
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best describes the lives of people living in Arabia’s deserts before the spread of Islam?
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these provisions was included in the Treaty of Versailles (1919)? A) European disarmament B) self-determination of all
Luda [366]
D is the correct answer to this
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best completes this diagram?
sveticcg [70]

The best statement to complete the diagram is that African Americans migrated to obtain jobs in northern factories.

<h3>Why were African Americans able to get jobs?</h3>

WWI had drained the nation of the manpower needed to sustain industrial production. This manpower however, had mostly been White people.

With them being in shortage on account of joining the army, African Americans were able to take their place and moved to the North to work in factories.

In conclusion, option B is correct.

Find out more on labor shortage in WWI at brainly.com/question/404503.

3 0
2 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the essential autonomy issue for Canada in the Statute of Westminister of 1931
    12·1 answer
  • What experiences did independence bring to new southeast Asian country’s
    11·1 answer
  • What factors characterized the red scare ?
    12·2 answers
  • How do scarce resources influence you personally?
    6·1 answer
  • Help me please solve this
    14·2 answers
  • What are some examples of globalization?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following factors led Greek communities to build both an army and a navy?
    15·1 answer
  • How do you think the Candy Bomber reflects the story of the Berlin Airlift?​
    12·1 answer
  • Explain why there were mass casualties and why no side was winning?
    13·1 answer
  • Tension grew in 1775 as British troops controlled Boston. In response, the colonists
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!