How about raising 286 up by 14 to 300 and compensating by lowering 428 by the same 14 Since I know that 14 + 14 is 28 then 28-14 is 14
So 428 - 14 = 414
So now I have 414 + 300 which I can do mentally - the answer is 714 and is also the answer to the original problem 428 + 286
Compensation works very well - bring one number up or down to a rounded number and compensate by doing the opposite to the other - instead of 199 + 457 - try 200 + 456
Same answer and because one of the numbers is nicely rounded, it is easy to add the other.
One more: 207 + 182 becomes 200 + 189 =389 I lowered one by 7 and raised the other one by the same 7.
Answer:
It is not a Type I error neither a Type II error.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let be the true mean match score. The null hypothesis is and the alternative hypothesis is (upper-tail alternative). When the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when actually is equal to 80 a Type I error is made. On the other hand, when the test shows that the mean match score is equal to 80 when actually is more than 80 a type II error is made. Therefore, when the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when the person does not actually have a fingerprint match, does not correspond to a Type I error neither to a Type II error.
Answer:
x = 12, y = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
x / y = 3
x - y = 8
Or
12 / 4 = 3
12 - 3 = 8
Answer:
The solution to the system is all the points that satisfy both inequalities or the region in which the shading overlaps. Given the system of linear inequalities shown in the graph, let's determine which points are solutions to the system. The point (0, -1) is not a solution to the system of linear inequalities.
Step-by-step explanation:
thank me later
Answer:
x+4/x-4
Step-by-step explanation:
=x/(x-4)+4/(x-4) [ l.c.m= (x-4)]
=x+4/x-4