A basic assumption of firearm sentence enhancement laws is that they will reduce gun violence through "<span>deterrence".
The idea of deterrence has two key suspicions: the first is that particular disciplines forced on guilty parties will "hinder" or keep them from perpetrating further crimes; the second is that fear of sentence will keep others from carrying out violations.
</span>
Considering the potential impact on others prior to making a decision is consistent with "ethical" behavior.
Ethical behavior refers to acting in courses predictable with what society and people normally believe are great qualities. Ethical behavior has a tendency to be useful for business and includes showing regard for key good rules that incorporate trustworthiness, reasonableness, correspondence, nobility, decent variety and individual rights.
These unselfish acts<span> that help others in a group so that they increase their chances of surviving and reproducing would be caused by an altruistic behaviour. To add up, the behaviour mainly emphasises the principle of selflessness in which the welfare of other people was given importance than itself.</span>
Answer:
i dont think so
Explanation:
Most things which we accept, we accept on the basis of proof. That proof is not always rock solid (some of it is based on spurious media claims, for example) but there is a standard to which we hold most of our beliefs. Things that don’t meet that standard – the Tooth Fairy, let’s say – we discard as not impossible, but extremely unlikely.
God, however, many people accept with no proof at all. Belief in God is a product of upbringing, societal and cultural convention, a desire for comfort and intellectual laziness.
There is no evidence that God exists. You may have had some kind of personal experience – what we “anecdotal evidence” that has convinced you personally that he’s out there. But most people would concede that that kind of evidence is not evidence at all. It can’t be repeated under test conditions and there are other possible explanations for what may have happened.
Fact: no-one has ever presented one iota of persuasive evidence that there is a God.
this helpful?
Answer:
B- Superficial, applied more in the abstract than in reality.
Explanation:
It's not unlikely to hear or read about protests or claims of freedom of speech. Usually, this is a claim of freedom of speech...as long as you think like the person.
Freedom of speech is the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, by any means. This already exists, and yet we encounter that people aren't tolerant against diversity (sexism, racism, homofobia, etc), leaving out option A and D. Not in every democracy we find freedom of speech; many times the opposition is censured or worse, leaving out option C.
The constant in all this scenarios is that freedom of speech is applied only in the speech, in ideas, but not in the action.
