Answer:
Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.
Explanation:
In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the<u> levels-of-processing effect</u> that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.
There are two main levels of processing: <u>shallow processing</u>, which has to do with fragile memory, and <u>deep processing</u><u>,</u> that involves a more durable memory trace.
<u>Deep processing</u> can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, <u>deep processing</u> can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.
Answer:
Yes , They do.
Explanation:
There are only two events that can overturn this.
First is if the supreme court justice personally stepped down from their position.
Second is if the supreme court justice receive an accusation that prove they are not in a 'good behavior'. In that case, the senates will review the accusation and vote among themselves to whether strip the supreme court justice or not.
B) An author discovers that an early Greek historian exaggerated his claims to make them more entertaining is an action which is an example of historiography. This is because historiography is "the study of the methodology of historians in developing history as an academic discipline, and by extension is any body of historical work on an particular subject."
