Answer:
Conflict perspective
Explanation:
Our society comprises of an ever-changing set of relationships with essential differences of economic interests. Conflict is a common phenomenon in all human sociological strata and sport is not an exception. Sport provides a common ground for participants and spectators to discuss common subjects relating to the sport and argues based on facts to uphold facts and general predictions on various topics in a competitive environment.
<h2>
Howdy,</h2>
Levi's brand of denim jeans.
I beleive its a federal republic
Can you add the options pls
In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
