The answer is true
i hope this helps
IN FRONT of your vehicle.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A is saying that the electoral college usually chooses what people vote for
B is saying that an elector doesnt have to vote for what their state says. this is a negative statement
C is not true but its not an opinion any way
E is true but is not an opinion
Answer:
Warring States Period
Explanation:
the WSP was an area in ancient Chinese history characterized by warfare, as well as bureaucratic and military reforms and consolidation. I hope this helps.
