Answer: See Explanation
Explanation:
The payback period for both projects would be calculated as:
Alpha Project
Cost = $530,000
Annual net cash flow = $60,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $530,000 / $60,000
= 8.83
Beta Project
Cost = $170,000
Annual net cash flow = $18,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $170,000 / $18,000
= 9.4
We can see that Alpha Project is better as the payback period is lesser than Beta project
Answer:
The answer is 14.87%
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
A large company stock had an average return of =12.59%
The average risk free rate = 2.58%
A small company stocks average is =17.45
The next step is to find the risk premium on small-company stocks for this period
Thus,
The risk premium on small-company stocks = Average return on small-company stocks - average risk-free rate
So,
Risk premium on small-company stocks = .1745 - 0.258
=0.1487
Therefore the risk premium on small company stocks for the period was 14.87%
Answer:
Performance appraisal in a company with diverse workforce becomes difficult because of some cultural biases that may exist between the manager, who is doing the appraisal, and the diverse workforce. This problem becomes more acute if the manager is culturally biased and discriminatory by practise.
Explanation:
Company A can have a diverse workforce if it is made up of employees from culturally different places working together in the same workplace. Bias often arises due to human cultural nuisances. This becomes more obvious where managers are from some particular cultures while the employees are from mixed cultures. In such situations, the managers need to be retrained to enable them embrace cultural diversity in the workplace and in performance evaluation.
