If the transformation will result to an after-image that not is congruent to the original figure, then the transformation is most probably a dilation. Amon the choices, the answer must be
<span>a reflection across the y-axis followed by a dilation with a scale factor of 0.5
</span>
First you input the equation into the quadratic formula:
__________
x=<span><span><span>−<span>(<span>−2</span>)</span></span>±<span>√<span><span><span>(<span>−2</span>)</span>2</span>−<span><span>4<span>(1)</span></span><span>(5)</span></span></span></span></span>
</span> -----------------------------
2(1)
Next you simplify the formula:
___
x=<span><span>2±<span>√<span>−16
</span></span></span></span> ------------
2
This problem has no real solutions.
Aren’t you supposed to multiply the exponents to where it’s 5^24 ?
Answer:BRUH
Step-by-step explanation:
BRUH
Answer:
second option
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the rule
(x, y ) → (x + 3, y - 5)
This means add 3 to the original x- coordinate and subtract 5 from the original y- coordinate, that is
D(4, - 4 ) → D'(4 + 3, - 4 - 5 ) → D'(7, - 9 )
E(5, - 5 ) → E'(5 + 3, - 5 - 5 ) → E'(8, - 10 )
