After a justice is appointed to the Supreme Court, what is the next step in the process?

Social Studies

1 answer:

fgiga [73]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The constitutional formula for appointing members of the highest judicial body of the United States is very concise: judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President of the United States and must be approved by the majority of the Senate. However, behind this simple wording, a rather complicated and, in some cases, dramatic political and legal procedure . The Senate is the main limiter of the respective presidential powers. Initially, the candidacy of a judge is considered by the Senate Legal Committee, which can also schedule direct hearings with the participation of the candidate.

Namely the presidential power, partly limited by the Senate majority, determines the political and legal entity of the US Supreme Court. However, it should be noted such a feature of the judiciary as the longest term of office (the average term in the US Supreme Court is about 20 years) in relation to both the presidential administration (four years and a maximum of eight years in total) and the Senate (six years, despite the fact that every two years a third of senators is re-elected). Thus, current US presidents often form the composition of the Court not so much to ensure their own cooperation with the judiciary as they determine the future nature of the complex mechanism of checks and balances in the United States.

A brief constitutional formula for the appointment of judges in the practice of its implementation is supplemented by a significant number of formal and informal requirements for candidates. The tendency of expanding the representation of various social groups (gender, faith, age, racial, national, socio-economic) as part of the current Court has been identified. The current situation with the appointment of a new judge of the Supreme Court is complicated by the proximity of elections and the possibility of dragging out the procedure until the new president takes office, the party and ideological confrontation between the democratic President and the Republican majority of the Senate, the fundamental importance of a new judge who can significantly change the ideology and practice of the Court in a liberal direction, ok, let's?

Explanation:

You might be interested in

When one’s attitudes and beliefs favoring drug use exceed one’s attitudes and beliefs unfavorable toward drug use, the likelihoo

Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

<em>Principle of differencial association. </em>This varies in frequency and intensity

Explanation:

This is because, the urge towards unfavorable actions is higher than that of favourable action. Example, some people have the urge to commit crime like armed robbery despite the fact that the are comfortable in life.

4 0

3 years ago

A common way of compensating teams is a ___________ system, in which bonuses are based on improvements over a previous performan

S_A_V [24]

A common way of compensating teams is a : Gain sharing system

in a gain sharing system, Each member of the team will recieve an additional intensives everytime they passed a target.
This will motivate the team members and will lead to an increase o working efficiency

8 0

3 years ago

What have Europeans done to try to solve the problem of so many languages?

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

Correct answer is Required school children to learn one or two other languages besides their native language.

Explanation:

The only correct answer is the last option as on schools across Europe besides their Native language children are using additional language(s). It is usually English outside the country where English is first language and depends on geographical location.

All other options are not correct as they are depriving people from their basic human rights, which the laws of EU are not allowing.

7 0

3 years ago

Why would term life insurance costs be different for two people who are the same age?

WARRIOR [948]

Your answer is D The insurance cost would be different based upon health profiles, age, and converge.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

government and the wealthy benefit from the existence of the poor and this is the main reason why poverty continues to exist bri

seropon [69]

Answer:

Poverty and wealth are often found side by side. They are two dimensions in our world that are interrelated because they affect each other and influence both the willingness and capacity of states to ensure a stable global system. Traditional approaches to IR are premised on the notion of state sovereignty. But, sovereignty as an absolute concept that reinforces separation between states has been tempered through the many processes of globalisation, including economic agreements and the establishment of international organisations, as well as with the emergence of human rights thinking as captured through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With respect to the emergence of human rights thinking, the premise goes that in the context of a common set of universal rights based on the individual, the sovereignty of the state can be challenged if a government does not respect or maintain these rights. Here, sovereignty means that a state does not only maintain rights, it also meets its responsibilities. Poor people are cheated out of their savings and the rich flaunt their money like it's honest and hard worked generated money.

6 0

3 years ago