Answer:
They believe that the Bill of Rights are not necessary because the government should have control over these decisions.
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Explanation:
The correct option is option 1. The 1851 Ohio Constitution increased the power of the General Assembly.
What was the need for the 1851 amendment in the Ohio constitution?
Many Ohioans thought the 1803 Constitution should be replaced by 1850. The first constitution's authors were not aware of new problems that had emerged. The Ohio General Assembly was endowed with considerable power by the Constitution of 1803. The legislature held the authority to choose judges and all other government officials, with the exception of the governor. As a result, the legislature had almost total power over the executive branch. The Supreme Court was mandated by the Constitution of 1803 to convene once a year in each county of the state. There were few counties when the Constitution of 1803 first came into operation. The following fifty years saw a growth in the number of counties, making it nearly difficult for the Supreme Court to do out its
Find more about the US constitution from the link below:-
brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ13
Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer legal liabilities caused by a wrongful act committed. If Bill did nothing wrong and he is being accused by the store of theft and he did nothing wrong. He can put the store in court because of emotional distress and negligence. <u>In this case, the answer is True and the store is committing a tortious act</u>.
Explanation:
please mark me as a brainlist..
