Answer:
Option C: Production Era
Explanation:
The production era. Is known as Stage 2 of marketing's evolution. found in the 1930s, highest production capability than ever before. The problem now became competition then. It was characterized by mass production of lots of products increased the availability of product in the marketplace that is available.
Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that arises for fixed-rate investments from fluctuating interest rates. How much interest rate risk a fixed-rate investment has depends on how sensitive its price is to interest rate changes in the market.
Answer:
Managers should be held responsible for only those cost, revenues, or assets over which they have substantial control should be considered as a
FALSE Statement.
Explanation:
In order to understand this statement comprehensively, we need to know the following two views.
The Omnipotent View
The Symbolic View
The Omnipotent view
This view defines and makes managers wholly responsible for all the success and losses of an organisation. This view referred managers as completely liable for all the operations, causes and their resulting effects within an organisation. No matter what, they are held liable for the consequences. For example, when a football team performs, coaches and managers are held liable and they come under radar in case of bad performances.
The symbolic View
This view says that managers make decisions in the best interest of the firm on the base of available resources, assets, costs and revenues but there are certain things which are beyond their control, they have very less or little control over certain things like economy, political environment – rules and regulations, competitors actions, market conditions, having control over technology etc.
Consequently, mangers cannot be held completely responsible; they have limited impact and effect over the organisational performance.