Answer:
The people grant power to a government for the well-being of all
Explanation:
This theory is one of the speculations that originated. It has been raised since the time of the critics of Greece, yet it has got acknowledgment in the hands of the incredible trio. The name of these extraordinary savants was – John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean Jacques Rousseau.
It expresses that the conditions in the condition of nature sooner or it became terrible, and to happen to this circumstance, the individuals entered themselves into an agreement, and as indicated by this agreement, the individuals will give up some piece of their entitlement to the sovereign.
The answer is B because it makes sense
<u>You need to stay current with local news</u> in order to respond to questions like this. Boycotts and protests are extremely common occurrences; mainstream media, local media, and even alternative media outlets regularly cover them.
"Touch the grass," as the saying goes, implies to observe outside of your comfort zones. Get off the internet and interact with individuals who are fighting for their human fundamental needs such as adequate housing, wage increases, accessible healthcare, climate justice, cheaper costs for essential necessities like gasoline, and so on.
To provide evidence or examples in history, we can trace the 8-hour workday of today's workers back to earlier labor movements of various unions. Because of these labor movements, we despise child labor. Previously, workers' boycotts and strikes had a significant impact on how we opposed cruel capitalistic ways.
Power of the people to organize themselves to protect each other helped people create change successfully.
There's nothing wrong with knowing about the history of struggles in your own nation and siding with the downtrodden rather than looking aside and empowering the oppressors.
Learn how the Montgomery bus boycott affected the civil rights movement: brainly.com/question/8475876
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. all of the above
Explanation:
Arbitration is a legal technique of resolving disputes outside the courts, whereby parties involved in the dispute refer it to an arbitrator (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal") or arbitrators( one or more persons) , by whose decision (the "award") they may be bound(as in mandatory arbitration) or not(as in voluntary or nonbinding arbitration).
The above methods of arbitration :peer review, arbitration, mediation all allow the dispute parties' input before arbitration decision. Peer review method involves dispute resolution in the workplace whereby employees are able to take disputes to fellow employees and managers to act as arbitrator to resolve disputes which may not be binding on the parties. Mediation on another hand is a dynamic method of dispute resolution where a third party helps to resolve disputes by helping dispute parties negotiate to resolve to dispute. Arbitration however differs from mediation in that the arbitrator makes decisions based on evidence presented and not waiting to negotiate an agreement between both parties. All three methods however require dispute parties to make inputs so as to arrive on final decision.
