Explanation:
An employee should be paid for the number of hours he worked in the organization and the number of hours he worked overtime for the company. Also if the employee has worked for company on holidays, he should be paid overtime allowance for that.
So according to the above criteria, the following options are appropriate determinants of how much should an employee be paid.
- Determine the number of hours the employee worked
- Determine whether the employee worked overtime hours
- Determine whether any of the days worked are holidays that receive holiday overtime payment rates.
So these above mentioned options determine how an employee should be paid.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Hybrid cars use both electricity and gasoline motors and engines. The concept behind this is that the electricity gives the car better acceleration and the gasoline then maintains it.
Developed countries tax gasoline due to its emissions but don't really tax electricity. On realizing this, designers recognized that they could combine both gasoline and electricity to create hybrids that would decrease the cost of taxation of using gasoline.
Answer:
21%
Explanation:
The formula to compute the annual rate of return is shown below:
= Annual net income ÷ average investment
where,
Annual net income equal to
= Annual revenues - annual expense
= $122,610 - $72,000
= $50,610
And, the average investment would be
= (Initial investment + salvage value) ÷ 2
= ($471,000 + $11,000) ÷ 2
= $482,000 ÷ 2
= $241,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the rate would equal to
= $50,610 ÷ $241000
= 21%
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
Let us consider Porter’s Five forces strategy, in analyzing the particular scenario of Bank and that of the firm which produces T3MP chemical.
As the bank is an early mover in the issuance of ATM cards, the bank definitely got the competitive advantage. As an early mover, the bank faced very low threat of new entrants with regard to distribution of ATM cards. Therefore, the bank could capture a large area of urban region. Also, the switching cost for bank customers is quite high and in the case of banks, generally the individual customers prefer to stick to one or two banks. As an early mover, this was definitely an advantage to the bank. As a result, the bank also got a loyal customer base in the long run. When the brand loyalty was combined with the high switching cost of bank products; in terms of ATM, the entry of a potential competitor was difficult for the bank. Since the ATM cards are unique to each customer and bank, the ATM products adopts a generic differentiation strategy in terms of technology and point of locations. The place is definitely a competitive advantage of bank ATMs and being an early mover, they could capture a large share of customers in the urban areas.
As the ATM cards are specially made for the particular banks, they are definitely a tool for gaining advantage over the competitors. Hence the bank enjoys a definitive leadership in terms of its competitive advantage as an early mover where it could capture a large urban area, and in terms of technology where one bank’s ATM card doesn’t fit into another.
In the case of second firm, which has a 60 percent share of T3MP, faces the threat from substitute products. But T3MP has got the competitive advantage over its substitute product, due to the low bargaining power of customers. T3MP seems to have only a major substitute, whose market share seemed to have dented by the increase in price of the substitute. The low price of T3MP compared to the substitute is definitely a competitive advantage for the firm. This would decrease the competition from the substitute product which in turn will increase the sale of T3MP. Further, the substitute won’t be able to limit the growth of T3MP by setting a sealing price. The firm could increase its marginal returns through increased sale of T3MP. Thus the firm could capture the market share of the substitute which is twice as that of T3MP and could increase its revenue and earning potential.
The unlevered cost of capital is 11.4 percent for this case. Therefore the value of this firm will be Vu = 78400 / 0.114 = 687719.2982 $. The correct answer is 687719.2982 $