Your communication style matches theirs
ask them what they heard. how they might explain it to others
keep your message on one subject. don't confuse the subject with multiple ideas
Answer:
Real purchasing power increase= 2.16%
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You deposit $1,900 in your savings account that pays an annual interest rate of 3.25%. The inflation rate is 1.09%.
In this example, we have two different and opposite effects. The interest rate increases your purchasing power. If the inflation rate is 0, the purchasing power will increase (in one year) 3.25%.
The inflation rate decreases the purchasing power of nominal income.
Real purchasing power increase= annual interest rate - inflation rate
Real purchasing power increase= 3.25 - 1.09= 2.16%
Answer: D. will be less than the intrinsic value of stock Y
Explanation:
Based on the information given above, the intrinsic value of Stock X will be calculated thus:
D1 = Dividend in next year = $3
g = growth rate = 7%
r = = 13%
Therefore, intrinsic value of Stock X will be:
= D1 / (r-g)
= 3 / (13% - 7%)
= 3/6%
= 3 / 0.06
= $50
Therefore, the intrinsic value of stock X is $50.
Intrinsic value of Stock Y will b calculated thus:
D1 = $4
g = 7%
r = 13%
Intrinsic value of Stock Y will be:
= D1 / (r-g)
= 4 / (13% - 7%)
= 4/6%
= 4 / 0.06
= 66.67
Intrinsic value of Stock Y is $66.67
Therefore, the intrinsic value of Stock X will be less than the intrinsic value of Stock Y
Answer:
$1,050
Explanation:
Her adjusted gross income is $32,750, so she can claim maximum of 50% of Child and Dependent Care Expenses as CDC Credit
= $2,100 * 50%
= $1,050
So, the amount she can claim for the California Child and Dependent Care Expenses (CDC) Credit is $1,050
Bistro's first banner was a form of a unilateral contract. This means that the banner was a legally enforceable promise between two parties where one party will perform the requirement and the other (Bistro) would pay.
For the given situation, Daisy substantially performed the required task and therefore, Bistro is not allowed to revoke the offer.
Based on the above, the statement that <span>best describes Daisy's and Bistro's rights in this situation is:
</span><span>Bistro cannot revoke the offer because Daisy has substantially performed the requested action.</span>
