The main difference between inductive and deductive reasoning is that when we're doing inductive reasoning we're trying to create formal rules or formal inferences from a limited set of information, while during deductive reasoning, we're trying to deduce what would happen in a certain case based on general information available.
Available options are:
A. a scientific inquiry is used only by scientists.
B. scientific inquiry is a process of asking and answering questions.
C. scientific inquiry has only one correct pathway.
D. scientific inquiry often involves similar processes and practices.
E. scientific inquiry involves performing investigations and collecting data.
Answer:
B, D, E
Explanation:
Given that scientific inquiry is a term that described how people mostly scientists, observe the natural world and then come out with credible justification established on the findings that were derived.
Hence, the statements that describe scientific inquiry are:
1. B. scientific inquiry is a process of asking and answering questions. Through this, scientist want to understand the reason behind a certain phenomenon
2. D. scientific inquiry often involves similar processes and practices. To carry out scientific studies, certain steps and practices are required, regardless of the subject under study, which does not entirely change.
3. E. scientific inquiry involves performing investigations and collecting data. This is because to carry out a scientific inquiry, part of the steps and practice includes performing investigations and collecting data, regardless of the subject under study.
Answer:I think it was The Heat waves can be dangerous, causing illnesses such as heat cramps and heat stroke, or even death. Warmer temperatures can also lead to a chain reaction of other changes around the world. That's because increasing air temperature also affects the oceans, weather patterns, snow and ice, and plants and animals
Explanation:
hope this helps have a nice night ❤️❤️❤️
Answer:
They should all have purple flowers.
Explanation:
This is because plants use the reproduction called mitosis, which means that the child will be a direct copy of the parent.
Hope this helps! :)
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
