Answer:
The difference between autonomous expenditure and induced expenditure is as follows:
The autonomous expenditure is incurred even without a disposable income. The expenditure is incurred to provide basic necessities of life. In such a situation, the person spends from savings account or borrows to ensure that the basic necessities are provided.
On the other hand, induced expenditure is a disposable income-based expenditure. This implies that when disposable income rises, induced expenditure also rises, and vice versa. Induced expenditure is usually incurred to fund normal goods and services and not necessities. Without disposable income, there is no induced expenditure.
All the four sectors of the economy engage in these expenditures. The public (government) and household sectors are mostly affected. However, even the business and non-profit sectors are also affected by these types of expenditure.
Explanation:
We can distinguish between two types of aggregate expenditure. The first one is autonomous aggregate expenditure, which does not vary with the level of real GDP while induced aggregate expenditure varies with real GDP.
Answer:
$31,320.00
Explanation:
The formula for accounting rate of return is the annual net cash flow divided by the initial investment.
If the initial investment was $522,000 and the accounting rate of return is computed to be 6% per year, hence the annual increase in cash flow accruing from the investment can be calculated by changing the subject of the formula.
ARR=annual increase in cash flow/initial investment
ARR is 6%
initial investment is $522,000
annual increase in cash flow?
6%=annual increase in cash flow/$522,000
annual increase in cash flow=6%*$522,000= $31,320.00
False. It involves the ability to take charge of things or starting/doing things independently on ones own.
Answer:
Question 1)
Decrease in money supply = Decrease in checking account / Required reserves ratio
Decrease in money supply = $25,000 / 0.05
Decrease in money supply = $500,000
NOTE: As per Answering Policy, first question is answered.
Explanation:
Question 1)
Decrease in money supply = Decrease in checking account / Required reserves ratio
Decrease in money supply = $25,000 / 0.05
Decrease in money supply = $500,000
NOTE: As per Answering Policy, first question is answered.
The question is reconstructed below:
Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?
A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.
B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.
C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Answer:
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Explanation:
Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.
