Answer:Governments intervene in markets to address inefficiency. In an optimally efficient market, resources are perfectly allocated to those that need them in the amounts they need. In inefficient markets that is not the case; some may have too much of a resource while others do not have enough. Inefficiency can take many different forms. The government tries to combat these inequities through regulation, taxation, and subsidies. Most governments have any combination of four different objectives when they intervene in the market.
Maximizing Social Welfare
In an unregulated inefficient market, cartels and other types of organizations can wield monopolistic power, raising entry costs and limiting the development of infrastructure. Without regulation, businesses can produce negative externalities without consequence. This all leads to diminished resources, stifled innovation, and minimized trade and its corresponding benefits. Government intervention through regulation can directly address these issues.
Another example of intervention to promote social welfare involves public goods. Certain depletable goods, like public parks, aren’t owned by an individual. This means that no price is assigned to the use of that good and everyone can use it. As a result, it is very easy for these assets to be depleted. Governments intervene to ensure those resources are not depleted.
Macro-Economic Factors
Governments also intervene to minimize the damage caused by naturally occurring economic events. Recessions and inflation are part of the natural business cycle but can have a devastating effect on citizens. In these cases, governments intervene through subsidies and manipulation of the money supply to minimize the harsh impact of economic forces on its constituents.
Socio-Economic Factors
Governments may also intervene in markets to promote general economic fairness. Government often try, through taxation and welfare programs, to reallocate financial resources from the wealthy to those that are most in need. Other examples of market intervention for socio-economic reasons include employment laws to protect certain segments of the population and the regulation of the manufacture of certain products to ensure the health and well-being of consumers.
Explanation:
ok
Answer:
$392,000
Explanation:
Double-declining-balance method is (2/useful life) x cost -accumulated depreciation)
cost = purchase price - residual value
2/5 x( 1000000-20000)
= $392,000
Answer:
extended problem solving
Explanation:
A situation where a buyer is buying a product he or she has never bought before hence requires considerable efforts, such is termed extended problem solving. The reason is that a buyer does not have prior experience about the product or the supplier, thereby creating complex buying decisions.
In extended problem solving, buyers evaluate and search for information about products they intend to buy due to the fact that they are not familiar with the products. Here, buyers search for all available information inorder to choose among brands of products they intend to buy; being the first time of purchasing such.
Answer: Market Sector
Explanation:
According to the given question, Melissa is working in the fashion based industry and the her main task in the job is to analyzing the new fashion trends in the social media.
Melissa is in the market sector part in an organization as her company are designing the various types of branded clothes on the basis of latest analysis and trends.
The market sector is widely used in the various types of financial and the economical based industry where the product of the company are produced on the basis and proper analysis in the market for the direct competition.
Therefore, Market sector is the correct answer.
Answer:
b. there are no gains from specialization and trade between the two countries.
Explanation:
If the two countries are producing goods with the same opportunity cost, then there is no need or advantage gained from the trade of goods between these two countries.
Usually, countries trade with each other if one has a comparative advantage of producing one good over the other trading country. Then in this case is can specialize in making that good and trade the excess to the other country.
However, in the case when two countries are producing apples and oranges. And opportunity cost producing orange for country 1 is one apple and same for country 2
Opportunity cost for Country 1 : 1 Apple = 1 Orange
Opportunity cost for Country 2 : 1 Apple = 1 Orange
Then countries will gain no additional benefit from specializing in one good.
