Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27dd1/27dd126ca5bffcf38cc4ca1f14a21b4daf72643e" alt="x=\frac{9}{8}\ yards"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66a9d/66a9dffe28250e781f0de3ea08be97a34699ab3b" alt="x=1.125\ yards"
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's call x the length of each piece in yards
If the ribbon is cut into 8 equal pieces then the sum of the pieces is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60b4b/60b4b7d65afa2fb8048370eb176886fcd74ff0cb" alt="x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x=8x"
Then:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/167bd/167bdf6e0589ef54711ea59fd8a30c35d9af1426" alt="8x=9\ yards"
Now we solve the equation for x
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/167bd/167bdf6e0589ef54711ea59fd8a30c35d9af1426" alt="8x=9\ yards"
Divide both sides of equality by 8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff403/ff403e494f875823e58235884645d266c23ee5d7" alt="\frac{8}{8}x=\frac{9}{8}\ yards"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27dd1/27dd126ca5bffcf38cc4ca1f14a21b4daf72643e" alt="x=\frac{9}{8}\ yards"
So the length of each piece is
of a yard.
This is: 1.125 yards
1420-1065 = 355 dollars. Lets find out how many percent 355 dollars are of the original prise. We divide them 355/1420= 0,25, we then say 0,25 * 100 = 25%
Hello there, and thank you for posting your question here on brainly.
To find mean absolute deviation, (MAD) you have to add all the numbers together, and then divide by how much numbers are in the set.
So we have to do 10 + 11 + 15 + 16 + 18, and then divide by 5.
10 + 11 + 15 + 16 + 18 ===> 70
Now, divide by 5.
70 / 5 ===> 14
The mean absolute deviation is 14.
Hope this helped! ☺♥
Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.